The U.S. Supreme Court Ruled That Tomatoes Are Vegetables
In Nix v. Hedden, the U.S. Supreme Court held that tomatoes are vegetables for the purposes of the tariff act of 1883, while accepting that botanically they are the fruit of a vine.
A vegetable, in U.S. tariff law. In Nix v. Hedden the Supreme Court accepted that tomatoes are botanically the fruit of a vine, but classed them as vegetables in the common language of the people.
Explanation
The question of whether a tomato is a fruit or a vegetable once reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The case, Nix v. Hedden, was about money. Importers had paid a duty on tomatoes brought from the West Indies, charged under the tariff act of 1883 as vegetables, and argued the tomatoes should have come in free as fruit. In the Court’s words, the single question was whether tomatoes, considered as provisions, are to be classed as vegetables or as fruit within the meaning of that act. The opinion grants the science: botanically speaking, tomatoes are the fruit of a vine, just as are cucumbers, squashes, beans and peas. But in the common language of the people, the Court said, all these are vegetables, usually served at dinner with the main part of the meal and not, like fruits generally, as dessert.
Source and verification
- Source
- U.S. Supreme Court, Nix v. Hedden Tier A
- Last verified
- Confidence
- 90 out of 100
- Verified by
- Ali Ahmad Chaudhry